In the shadow of history is a book which consists of
articles written by Mubarak Ali. The writer believes that political history is
mostly used by dictators and tyrants whereas social history focuses cultural
and social values which bring people together. He views history taught at our
educational institutions as political history, which serves the ruling classes.
Moreover he also talks about attempts by historians to mold history in their
own ways. Under the article Colonization
and Language Dr. Mubarak Ali explains that military defeat is followed by
attacks on social and cultural institutions and traditions in an attempt to
make them worthless.
Ali further talks about the role of conspiracies in
history. Quoting examples of Greek, Egypt and the Mughals he condemns romanticizing
history. He firmly believes that history is not a romantic tale rather it is
full of sorrow and misery. Blaming the Sufis he holds them responsible for
making people passive and turning them into submissive beings. In addition to
that he writes about the falsification of history giving examples of Hamaudur
Rehman Commission and Jinnah’s speeches. In addition to that the author adds
that Vasco de Gama and Columbus were guided by Muslim seafarers.
Emphasizing on the need to learn from history the author
advocates that any nation should accept its mistakes. Ali writes about the need
for young researchers to play an active role in historical writing. He quotes
Engels who says: “He who writes history textbooks, writes history”. He
addresses the problems in Pakistan regarding the writing of history and
problems of research in Pakistan. With that he considers the future of research
in Pakistan very bleak.
During Ayub Khan’s military dictatorship the subject of
history was replaced by social studies. As a consequence history lost its
independence. Further in the book the author criticizes Z.A Bhutto for lack of
far-sightedness and lust for power. Due to this he lost the chance to
strengthen democratic traditions in the country. 23 March was regarded
significant after the independence of Bangladesh as it had challenged the very
basis of two nation theory. Thereupon its celebration and importance started
gaining strength.
The landed aristocracy of India was the backbone of the
modern school system introduced by the British. In a residential school there
was no common mess and each boy had his own cook and kitchen. VIP Culture is
traced back in history. During the decline of the Mughal Empire an anecdote regarding
Mirza Ghalib is shared. Mirza Ghalib refused to serve in a college only because
the principal did not come to receive him.
The author considers the prevalent system of democracy in
Pakistan as feudal. Dr. Mubarak Ali criticizes fascism, hero-worship and dictatorship.
He believes that societies which only rely on heroes for their survival do not
prosper. This approach creates confusion in human minds. Instead of remedying
their problems they wait for messiahs.
In the second half of the book, most of the articles are
written on Sindh. This includes the Arab conquest of Sindh, feudalism, Sindh
under foreign rule, Hindu Muslim conflict, and separation of Sindh from Bombay Presidency
and nationalism in Sindh. Some of the other articles are about Mazilgah Mosque,
communal violence, Sindhi nationalism, Ethnic division in Sindh, peasant
rebellions in Sindh and banditry.
This book give one a flash back of major events in
history and also highlights the distortions of history which have aggravated problems
and hindered a progressive approach.
0 comments:
Post a Comment