Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Book Review: Islands of Hope- Recollections of Dr Akhter Hameed Khan compiled by the AHK Resource Centre


Never before have I come across a more detailed book on the life and times of Dr. Akhter Hameed Khan who served humanity in a very special way and left behind a legacy for others to follow. Khan was a very different man. Some considered him a social scientist while others added various other titles including poet, scholar, community development expert and philosopher.

Very early in his career he left the Indian Civil Services and opted to become a locksmith. He wanted to experience the misery of the downtrodden class. Later he became Director at the Comilla Project in East Pakistan where he was engaged in community mobilization and encouraged the participatory approach of development.

Akhter Hameed Khan later went to Karachi and initiated the Orangi Pilot Project. This project was based on self-help and power of the people living in the locality. He provided guidance with many aspects of the project. Technical assistance was provided to the resident of Orangi, regarding sewerage system and improvement of the environment. A micro-credit system was also established in the area which emphasized on self-reliance.

Dr. Khan received numerous awards, but paying tribute to him would only be justified when his work and ideas would be taught at university level. This would help his teachings in making their way to the development policies of the developing world. The twelve chapters in this book cover his early life, struggles in achieving his goals, his development works, efforts for a humane society, community mobilization methods and unfortunately the false cases initiated against him. The life of the maverick covered in this book teaches the reader the common lessons in life regarding idealism, sacrifice, hard work and persistence.

Dr. Akhter Hameed Khan said: “Pakistan’s development will not come from the top, it will come from the bottom, and it will happen in pockets – one island formed here, one there and one island will be made by you…”

Sunday, May 17, 2020

Book Review: The New Silk Roads: The Present and The Future of the World by Peter Frankopan


The New Silk Roads is basically an update on the previous classic of Peter Frankopan published in 2015. This one published after three years from 2015 is about interconnectedness of the world, complexities and the emerging patterns in world politics.

From Europe via Russia and Middle East the Silk Roads travel to China. Cooperation, strengthening of state level ties and intricacies of the networks of bondage are greatly debated in this book.  Assessment of the global shifts in power and the regional movements by different states to acquire power linkages is weaved together in a very plain, yet interesting manner. Moreover, food, economy, state politics and political maneuverings in the contemporary world are also covered in this book.

An easy to read book for a student, politician, military strategist or for anybody who cares about world affairs should read this book to analyze the quickly changing political landscape in which we live today.

Thursday, May 7, 2020

Book Review: Hiouen-Thsang in India by J. Barthelemy Saint-Hilaire


Based on three chapters, Hiouen-Thsang in India is a very interesting account of the famous Chinese pilgrim who travelled to India in the seventh century. The first chapter states that Hiouen-Thsang belonged to an honorable family who at the age of twenty completes his novitiate and gets his full monastic orders. Hiouen-Thsang feels that he lacks many things and for this he is determined for travel in the countries of the west. He intends to meet wise men whom he could consult for guidance regarding certain points of the Law. At last he escapes the city and travels during the nights. First he reaches a convent in the country of the Oi’gurs, where me meets Chinese monks.

At Kao-Tch’ang the King wants him as a teacher for his subjects for the rest of his life. To this offer he objects as he wants to travel futher. From there his protest is accepted by the King, as Hiouen-Thsang promises to come back to Kao-Tch’ang on his return journey. Thereon he travels to Kutch. After that he moves to Samarkand and from there to Baktra (Balkh). The pilgrim finally enters India. His sojourn in Maghada and Convent of Nalanda is explained in detail by the author. The way he is treated by different people throughout his journey is also discussed by Saint-Hilaire. The author brings out the character of the pilgrim and also reflects on the superstitions he carried with him. His method of translating sacred Buddhists books are also included in the book.

Hiouen-Thsang visited India before the Muslim conquest, it was still exclusively Brahmanist and Buddhist. In chapter two all the details and intricacies have been narrated by the author of this book. In addition, the pilgrim gives details about the climate, fruits, habits, customs and the religious practices carried out by the people he visited. He even analyses the marriage laws of the Indians, especially the laws forbidding a woman to have a second husband. The pilgrim also includes details on public administration, agriculture and metals in India. For two years he remains in Kashmir, engaged in serious studies.

In the last chapter the condition of Buddhist worship in the days of Hiouen-Thsang is clearly shown. The conflict between the sects and the level of intensity is also discussed by Saint-Hilaire. Moreover, the author also criticizes Hiouen-Thsang for his shortcomings and at places appreciated his efforts. In conclusion, the author agrees to the argument that Buddhist world studied their religion better than the Christian world.


Monday, May 4, 2020

Book Review: The Greatest Minds and Ideas by Will Durant


Before reading the page of contents I came across a wonderful quote by Will Durant. He says: “If a man is fortunate he will, before he dies, gather up as much as he can of his civilized heritage and transmit it to his children. And to his final breath he will be grateful for this inexhaustible legacy, knowing that it is our nourishing mother and our lasting life”. This particular book has been divided into six chapters. ‘A shameless worship of heroes’ is the first chapter of the book that expounds that now to acknowledge in life or history any genius bigger than ourselves has become unfashionable.  In addition, the author writes that the real history of man is not of the common man but that of the lasting contributions made by geniuses to the sum of human civilization and culture.

Durant makes his case by saying that “the history of civilization has been the adventure of human reason”. The criteria set by the author in gauging the greatest minds and ideas of all times is the extent and persistence of influence upon the lives and minds of men. Starting from number one Confucius, followed by Plato, Aristotle, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Copernicus, Sir Francis Bacon, Sir Isaac Newton, Voltaire, Immanuel Kant and Charles Darwin. Those excluded from the list include Marcus Aurelius, Spinoza, Nietzsche and many others. The author believes that many other lists could also be formed and the lists made by him is not the final.

The criteria set for the ten greatest poets by the author is to record men who have brought him that strange mixture of music, emotion, imagery, and thought, which is poetry. Homer, David, Euripides, Lucretius, LI-PO, Dante, William Shakespeare, John Keats, Percy Bysshe Shelley and Walt Whitman. He quotes many different poems of various poets categorized by him.

While categorizing the best hundred books for an education, the author provides a list of the hundred books categorizing them under different themes. The author says in the fourth chapter: “If you have studied with life rather than with courses, it maybe as well; the rough tutelage of reality has ripened you into some readiness to know great men. The first book on the author’s list is The Outline of Science. After that he suggests reading William James book Principles of Psychology.  Durant is of the view that even if a one does not agree with an author one should ‘nevertheless carry on reading, toleration of differences is one mark of a gentleman’.

Chapter five is about ten peaks of human progress. Defining ‘progress’, the author mentions that it is the “increasing control of the environment” and by environment he means “all the circumstances that condition the coordination and the realization of desire”. He briefly writes about the peaks, starting from Speech, followed by fire, the conquest of the animals, agriculture, social organization, morality, tools, science, education and writing. Moreover, the author adds that ‘never was our heritage of civilization and culture so secure and never was it half so rich’. The sixth, which is the last chapter of this book briefly explains the twelve most vital dates in world history. They are as follows:
·         
  • 4241 B.C- The Introduction of the Egyptian Calendar
  • 543 B.C.- The Death of Buddha
  • 478 B.C.- The Death of Confucius
  • 399 B.C.- The Death of Socrates
  • ? B.C.- The Birth of Christ
  • A.D. 632- The Death of Mohammed
  • 1294- The Death of Roger Bacon
  • 1454- The Press of Johannes Gutenberg (at the Mainz on the Rhine) issues the first printed documents bearing a printed date
  • 1492- Columbus Discovers America
  • 1769- James Watt brings the steam engine to practical utility
  • 1789- The French Revolution
The author concludes the book hoping that the reader makes his own list, which shall
help him in clarifying human development.


Thursday, April 30, 2020

Book Review: The Dancing Girls of Lahore by Louise Brown


I have not come across a more in depth narration of the living conditions of the inhabitants of the Shahi mohallah of Lahore. The writer stays at Iqbal’s (a professor of National College of Arts) place in the Shahi mohallah and closes observes the lives of the people around her. Brown writes about her interaction with Maha and her daughters. Maha’s miseries and her financial conditions are brought to surface. When Maha was young she earned better than what she earned when she started approaching her middle age. Her daughters are now her only hope. Her marriage with Adnan is also troublesome.

Living in this part of Lahore, Maha also discovers the lives of the transgender community. She befriends some of them and observes their bonds and relationships within the community they live. Furthermore, the author describes the life around the eateries, cinema, streets and shops. She also adds the rituals of the month of Moharram when business in the mohallah is the lowest in the year. The class system and the hierarchies within the Shahi Mohallah are complex and Brown has explaines them in simple words. The use of drugs, rape, violence and money is elaborately discussed. Young girls in the area also do business in the other parts of Lahore. Some of them visit defence for dance parties and earn their living. Others, not all of them visit the gulf states and earn money.

Throughout the book the exploitation of woman is clearly highlighted by the author. Women who live in the mohallah cannot exit the vicious circle as they have many mouths to feed and they are the breadwinners for their families. It is saddening to know that daughters are considered gold, as they ensure the smooth living conditions by selling their bodies. The daughters when meet the standards of the mohallah sell their bodies and sustain their lives. Young girls are preferred for the business and are always in great demand. It would have been more helpful if the author had suggested some reforms for the denizens of the area. She has just written about a basic problem, without suggesting few solutions.

Unfortunately, the people living in the Shahi Mohallah will continue to suffer until drastic reforms are introduced to stop the exploitation of women which started many centuries ago. Readers should surely read this book as it presents a heartbreaking story of thousands of women who have become prey to the horrible exploitative system.

Sunday, April 26, 2020

Book Review: Lest We Forget: Gujarat 2002 Edited by Amrita Kumar and Prashun Bhaumik


Gujrat saw genocide and economic massacre in 2002. This happened when the BJP had gained marked popularity throughout many areas of India. This includes UP, Uttaranchal, Manipur and Punjab. Gujarat a BJP stronghold in the elections was yet to experience the worst. 

On 26 Feb 2002 the election results were announced and on the 27th of the same month Godhra was set ablaze. Later the rest of Gujarat was engulfed in this fire. The impact of September 11 attacks on the Muslims living in India, the socio-political dimensions leading to the crises situation in Gujarat, questions of state support to extremist elements in India and the debate of secularism vs Hindu fundamentalism, are discussed in this book. 

The atrocities in India, which really shocked the world is uncovered in great detail in this book.

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

Book Review: Night Train to Turkistan by Stuart Stevens


With three companions Stuart Stevens sets on a mission to retrace the renowned journey undertaken by Peter Fleming and Ella Maillart across Chinese Turkistan in 1934. In this journey by Stuart he is accompanied by a triathlete, a Kung Fu expert and a female rower. This group travels by bus, donkey cart, truck and bicycle and aeroplane. During this journey they face numerous challenges. Many of the challenges are political but the physical challenges are also worth reading. The harsh climate, landscape and remoteness during their journey is really interesting to read.

The author at many instances relates his own journey with Fleming’s and tries to draw various comparisons between both of them. Taklamakan desert, Buddhist caves, explorers who visited the caves, trading routes, different ethnicities, physical infrastructure, social conflicts, hotel facilities and the Chinese bureaucracy are under discussion in the book. Sometimes the book also seems to present a reflection in the form of a critique of the daily life in China.

In my opinion this is a good book for travelers who intend to learn from various experiences in life. Traveling with a group and not finding everything in perfect shape is obviously not very pleasing. Instead, keeping the group intact and learning from the harsh realities on the ground makes the traveler stronger minded for any future adventures.

Wednesday, April 15, 2020

Book Review: Readings in Liberalism by Detmar Doering


Detmar Doering, the Director of Liberal Institute in the introduction of the book argues that liberalism represents the finest of western tradition and the greatest of what constitutes modernity. He has very smartly summarized the main ideas discussed in this book. He writes that there is no complete definition of liberalism. One reason that he suggests is that politics continuously brings new challenges that require new liberal answers.

This book is an attempt to show the diversity within the tradition of liberalism. Texts included in this volume span the period from the 17th century writings of John Locke, through liberalism’s peak in the 19th century (represented here by Frederic Bastiat, for example), to contemporary authors such as Popper, Gray and Nozick. 

Various topics are under discussion in the book. John Stuart Mill’s thought on education, David Hume on justice, Wilhelm von Humboldt on the purpose of man, John Prince Smith on the free- are some of the examples. Names such as Adam Smith and the American thinker William Leggett are also present. The philosophical positions of various thinkers are presented. They have one thing in common. All of them help to establish the liberal idea of freedom.

John Locke’s work on the individual’s rights that predate the state, Hume’s political thought on the assumption that freedom and justice appear only with the cultural development that draws its dynamism from the individual’s striving for benefit are also mentioned in the book. This position, in turn, is taken to an extreme by Ludwig von Mises, who admits only the individual and his capability for economic calculation, thus rejecting any ideas of natural rights that predate the state. In the final analysis, all three arrive at the same conclusion, that the protection of property is one of the most liberal constitutional state’s most important tasks.

While Mill and Ortega y Gasset discern possible danger to freedom even in democracy, Leggett considers democracy to be freedom’s essential philosophical basis.  But all these approaches have one thing in common: They support liberalism’s idea of freedom. They support the idea that all power must be tied to the freedom of the individual. They both serve the struggle against every open form of totalitarianism and reinforce the warning against the creeping dismantling of freedom taking place through well-meaning state interventionism. Many approaches become apparent that all lead to the same goal. This goal is the open and liberal society that is based on the ideal of the freedom of the individual and on the principles of the constitutional state and the free market economy. Consideration of the bases of such a society (the present collection is intended to provide food for thought in this regard) is always a relevant task. As Friedrich August von Hayek once stated, “The guiding principle that a policy of freedom for the individual is the only truly progressive policy remains as true today as it was in the 19th century.”


Wednesday, April 8, 2020

Book Review: The Golden Days of Greece by Olivia Coolidge


Olivia Coolidge has written this simple yet interesting book on the glorious days of ancient Greece. This book is divided on seventeen chapters. Greece was a small rocky country. Greeks had been great sailors. They ate raisins. Olives, bread, goat’s milk cheese, fish and vegetables. They drank wine mixed with water. The Greeks gave names to their Gods. Zeus was the god of the sky and the father of all. Poseidon was his brother and was the god of sea. Apollo was god of the sun and Artemis was his twin sister.

Greeks were a group of wandering people who entered from the north, where it joins the rest of Europe. The first group arrived in 1900 B.C. they were called Achaeans. The Dorians arrived seven hundred years later. Dorians learned to use iron, which was more common than tin. When the Dorians with their iron swords swept over Greece about 1200 B.C., they came by land and sea from the North. Some lucky cities like Athens were never conquered. After burning others, the Dorians wandered on. In yet other places, mostly in the Peloponnese, which is the southern part of Greece, they settled down.

Greeks knew that life was hard for many, and they were content if they had good health, good children, good neighbors, and good luck. They wanted to be citizens whose memory was kept alive, even after death, by their own people. They did not think that great wealth made men happy, and they were not impressed by kings. In the fourth chapter on the Olympic Games the author writes that Olympic games were held in honor of Zeus in the territory of Elis, a city of the Peloponnese. These Olympic festivals came after every four years, and the period between one and the next was called an Olympiad. The Greeks did not allow boys to be naughty and it was important that a child should be never out of sight.

Most famous of the Dorians who settled in Peloponnese were the ones who lived in Sparta. The Spartans, as the Dorians liked to call themselves, were few in number. The Spartans liked sports useful in war such as the brutal boxing. Every Spartan owned a certain number of farms. Then people who lived on them were called a man’s Helots and were almost his slaves. A great deal of time was spent in keeping fit. Spartans did not trade or use money, so that there was no business to be done. Their clothes and armor were made by their women, their Helots, and other subjects who paid them tribute. It was really no wonder that the Spartans became the best soldiers in Greece. The Athenians, who were so proud of their own city, liked the Spartans for doing their duty.

In 490 B.C., the Persian King Darius sent a fleet to conquer some of the islands and then go on the attack the Athenians. The Athenians sent to the Spartans for help.  By the battle of Marathon, the Athenians saved themselves without Spartan help. A few years later King Darius of Persia died. He was succeeded by his son Xerxes. King Xerxes had a huge empire. Xerxes led his army to the narrow channel which divides Asia Minor from Europe in the northeast corner of the Aegean. Herodotos, the historian says that Xerxes made offerings and prayers for his efforts preparation for the war. The Spartans joined to fight against the Persians under Leonidas. The fighting broke out. Spartans fought till the last man. Some of the other Greeks surrendered but not the Spartans. When Aristodemos returned back to Sparta, nobody would speak to him for the rest of his life ashe was the only one who came home alive.

Just before the Persian attack the Athenians had discovered silver mines in their land. Their leader Themistocles advised them to put the money into building warships. The Greeks and the Persians fought. Many of the Persians fought bravely. Xerxes’s fleet was shattered and he decided to go back to Asia He divided his army and left many of his men to winter in Northern Greece. The Athenians had beaten the Persians by sea. It was now the turn of the Spartans to beat them on land. Aristodemos was the bravest on the Spartan side and he died on the field. Spartans refused any reward for Aristodemos as they did not believe in forgiving his mistakes of the past.

After the defeat of the Persian army Sparta and Athens went in different directions. Athenians became head of a great fleet to which other cities or islands gave ships or money. The league against Persia had in twenty years become the Athenian Empire. The Athenian assembly was an assembly of all the citizens.  The Assembly passed laws but for daily business they had a council of 500. They were not elected. They were simply chosen from all the citizens. It stayed in office for one year and was divided into ten groups of fifty. The president of the group of fifty which was in office was the President of Athens. The Athenians had no income tax but the rich people undertook unpaid jobs for their city. Further in chapter eight the Athenian ruler Pericles is discussed. His rise to power and reforms are discussed.

In Athens many of the slaves were prisoners of war. This included Persians, Ethiopians and Indians. Other captives were Greeks from other cities and Egyptians. Parthenon and Dionysus were discussed in separate chapters. Greek Gods, theatre, arts, sculptures, drama and poets are also discussed.

In the twelfth chapter life and death of Socrates is discussed. He was born in the year 469 in Athens and gave people a new way of understanding and questioning things. Many people objected to this. He was tried and then he had to drink the cup of poison.  His work, however, did not die as Plato’s writings made the name Socrates famous forever.

In chapter thirteen Plato is discussed. Plato was born in 429 B.C. He was thirty by the time Socrates died. People admired Plato for his qualities. He was strong and athletic. Taught by Socrates, Plato found that before he could think of being a statesman or a poet, he had to know more about truth. Plato turned away from Politics for a time and he began to write about Socrates. He wrote the speech of Socrates at his trail as far as he remembered it. Then he wrote talks which Socrates had, or might have had, with other people. Plato was trying to show the world what Socrates had been like, but to do so he put much of himself into these dialogues. Plato’s school was called academy.

The next two chapters discussed Xenophon and the strong king Philip. Philip was the youngest brother of Perdiccas and Alexander. He gained a Greek education, and a chance to study under two Theban generals who were the greatest military leaders of their times. Philip spent three years in Thebes and returned to Macedonia to start taming the wild tribesmen and forming an army drilled in the tactics of the great Thebans. In 359, when Philip was twenty-three years old, Perdiccas died. Macedonians rallied around Philip as they needed a strong leader.

Philip was athletic, handsome, and a fine rider. The victory of Chaeronea made Philip master of Greece. Philip was willing to be friends if the Athenians were willing to be become his allied, actually his subjects. Philip was forming a league of states to force internal peace and military union upon the Spartans, as he was facing refusal by the Spartans to enter their land. Philip had now announced a great campaign against Persia. The time was perfect as Artaxerxes III had just been murdered and the empire was in confusion.  Troops were raised from all the states when Philip was celebrating his daughter’s marriage to hone of his neighbors who was the king of Epirus.  Philip chose to walk alone in the wedding procession when he was struck down by one of his nobles who had a grudge against him. He was forty-six and so perished the strongest man that Greece had ever seen.

The second last chapter is regarding Alexander, Philip’s son. Alexander was twenty years old when has father was murdered, the only son of queen Olympias. Aristotle tutored Alexander. Aristotle himself had come to Plato’s Academy when he was seventeen and he had proved himself the best in Plato’s Academy.  Alexander later captured Egypt. He governed the people of the east with his Macedonian generals and also included Persian nobles. Victory followed him wherever he went. In 323 he was back from India in Babylon, preparing for the attack on Arabia when he fell sick of a fever along with the battle wounds. He died in the palace of the kings of Babylon on June 13, 323 B.C. He was only thirty-two years old.

The death of Alexander without an heir created confusion. Although his wife Roxana was expecting a child but an infant was useless in a time of serious confusion. Alexander’s generals carved up his empire. Egyptian, Macedonian and Asiatic areas of separate kingdoms came in place. Later Romans captured Greece.  The thoughts of the Greeks combined with the laws of the Romans have given us many of our own traditions. The beliefs and ideas of the Greeks still shape our world.

Saturday, March 28, 2020

Book Review: In the Name of Honour: A Memoir by Mukhtar Mai


Mukhtar Mai’s book is a true, bitter and inspiring account of her struggles in life. Her name came to surface in June 2002 when journalists wrote about her. She was gang raped and punished for an honor crime allegedly committed by her brother. The accusation against her brother was never proved. After Mukhtar Mai was gang raped she intends to commit suicide. Instead, she went against the local custom. She took her rapists to court. The true story in this book revolves around Mukhtar Mai who faces stiff resistance. Despite all odds she fights the powerful, establishes a school in her village and helps other women under oppression.

Amna Buttar who supports Mukhtar Mai very strongly is threatened by one of Pervez Musharraf’s closest friend Brigadier Ijaz Shah. Referring to a planned visit by Mukhtar and Amna to New York, Ijaz says: ‘We can do anything. We can just pay a little money to some black guys in New York and get people killed there.’

Mukhtar belongs to the peasant Gujar caste. Her rapists are from the powerful Mastoi clan. They initially accuse Mukhtar’s brother Shakur of having relation with Salma, a woman from their clan. They rape the 12-year-old Shakur. Later a local panchayat (tribal court) declares that a woman from Shakur’s family be made a symbol of punishment. Mukhtar Mai is chosen, and raped by a group of men. At first Mukhtar was depressed, but she stood up and took the rapists to court. Mukhtar says that: “In our villages, most peasants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, so people prefer to appeal to a jirga because the government’s justice costs too much”.

The author regrets that if she knew how to read and write then everything would have been much easier. Moreover, she says that in Pakistan it is difficult for a woman to prove that’s she has been raped, since she is legally required to provide four male eyewitnesses to the crime. On August 31, 2002, the court delivers its verdict stating six men condemned to death and fifty thousand rupees in damages and costs.

Mukhtar already in the news opens her first school with the help of the government by the end of 2002. The little girls start calling her Mukhtar Mai ‘respected big sister’. Later Mai befriends Naseem in whom she finds comfort. Further in the book the author explains the marriage customs, her own marriage and her divorce. In addition to that she talks about the different women who approach her and address her with their own grievances. Mukhtar mentions the case of Dr Shazia Khalid, who was raped in Balochistan and who had no choice but to leave the country with her husband, leaving her son back home. Mukhtar believes that she will not give up her identity and will work to provide relief to her country which faces many issues. Despite all odds Mukhtar Mai fights the powerful, establishes a school in her village and helps other women under oppression.