The End of India is a thought provoking book about the
crisis which continues to haunt India even today. Based on five chapters, this
book includes the problems of Gujarat, communalism and religious fanaticism in
India.
Singh writes that he won’t be surprised if the Muslims
living in Gujrat start paying jaziya which medieval Islamic rulers imposed on
their non-Muslim subjects. Ahmedabad, Gujrat’s capital was built by a Muslim
ruler in the middle ages. In 1998 the author observed that milestones on the
main highway leading to the city had changed and turned into Amdavad, with state-sponsored
help.
In the second chapter Singh says: “Both speech and silence
are pregnant with hate…” This sentence has a very strong and deep meaning which
I cannot refuse to mention in this review. According to the author Hindu
nationalism’s birth took place in Renaissance Bengal in 1886 with the Hindu
melas. The main objective of these melas were to train young Hindus in martial
arts, use of swords, daggers and lathis. Non-Hindus were not allowed to
participate in these events. Soon after the British overthrew the Mughal
empire, the rise in Hindu separatism began to accelerate. Hindu and Sikh
warriors like Prithviraj Chauhan, Guru Gobind Singh and Shivaji who resisted
the Muslim rulers, were portrayed as national heroes.
Later, after the death of Gandhi the RSS, VHP, BJP and RSS
offshoots like Bajrang Dal and Vanasvasi Kalyan Ashram have been implicated in
various communal riots all over the country. Discussing communalism, the author
believes that BJP is more dangerous as it uses democracy to camouflage its
fascist agenda. Tracing the history of communalism Singh mentions that after
Buddhism when Brahminical Hindusim gained favor again with ruling dynasties,
especially in the ninth and tenth centuries, Buddhists were persecuted and their
places of worship demolished. Later, in the reign of many Muslim rulers, Hindus
were discriminated against and their temples destroyed. He further adds that
when the British came to power they divided people not on religious lines, but
on racial lines.
The author of this book mentions his personal experiences
at the time of partition. He writes that in Lahore gangs from nearby Mozang had
started marking out Hindu and Sikh homes for loot and forcible occupation.
Discussing Indian politics Singh argues that the communal problem perfected by
the BJP began under the Congress. He believes the Congress party won its
landslide victory on a wave of anti-Sikh sentiment generated by it. Writing
about political parties he suggests that “One should not judge political
parties by the labels they wear on their lapels of by the high-sounding
manifestos issued by them, but by their actions.”
Moreover, Singh believes that the first step towards
securing the Indian future would happen, once the villain within themselves is
identified. He says: “The need of our times is to revive the Nehruvian notion
of secularism”. The author writes that after Gandhi and Maulana Azad respect
for all religions was a mere display of religiosity. He stresses that if you
were a devout Hindu you went to a Muslim dargah or threw an Iftar party to
prove you were secular. If you were a Muslim, you celebrated Diwali with your
Hindu friends. Secularism was reduced to a sham display.
The last chapter tries to present a solution to the looming
threat of Indian society. Making his case for the creation of a new religion
Singh mentions Bernard Shaw in the last chapter. Bernard Shaw had said that
every intelligent man makes his own religion though there are a hundred
versions of it. Singh says that our religion should make provision for the
future. It should incorporate family planning. He espouses that permanent
graves should not be allowed. The author says that: “good life is the only good religion”.
0 comments:
Post a Comment